Status:
UNKNOWN
Comparing Manipulation and Rehabilitation to Rehabilitation Only, in the Management of Chronic Ankle Instability
Lead Sponsor:
Cleveland Chiropractic College
Collaborating Sponsors:
Durban University of Technology
Conditions:
Chronic Ankle Instability
Eligibility:
All Genders
18-45 years
Phase:
NA
Brief Summary
It is hypothesized that a combination approach would produce increased clinically and statistically significant outcomes as opposed to standard single intervention, inclusive of comparatively greater ...
Detailed Description
Rationale 1. Inversion ankle sprains are the most frequently encountered injury to the ankle (Ferran and Maffulli, 2006) especially in the realm of the sporting arena (Balint et al, 2003; Delahunt, 2...
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion
- Participants with grade one (Grade I: evidence of minimal swelling with minimal dysfunction, point tenderness over joint, absence of positive anterior drawers sign) or grade two (Grade II: moderate amount of swelling and haemorrhage over the ankle with pain more do on weight bearing). Potentially positive anterior drawers sign but with no varus laxity CLAI (Reid, 1992; Pellow and Brantingham, 2001; Rimando, 2008).
- Participants between the ages of 18 - 45 years (Pellow and Brantingham, 2001; Chowdry et al, 2003; Parker, 2005).
- Participants that are clinically diagnosed as having CLAI: the presence of 4 or more of a combination of symptoms including lateral ankle pain, joint weakness, oedema (Tatro-Adams et al, 1995), joint crepitus, adhesions resulting in the formation of fixations in the joint and ligamentous laxity (Reid, 1992; Pellow and Brantingham, 2001; Ajis and Maffulli, 2006; McBride and Ramamurthy, 2006; Caulfield, 2007).
- Participants with a visual analogue scale (vas) (Liggins, 1982; Salaffi et al, 2003) score of between 20 and 70 millimetres to maintain homogeneity within the sample (Mouton, 1996).
- Participants with a foot/ankle disability Index (FADI) (Hale and Hertel, 2005) of between 50 and 90 to maintain homogeneity within the sample (Mouton, 1996).
- Participants with a berg balance scale (Kornetti et al, 2004) of less than 45/56 to maintain homogeneity within the sample (Mouton, 1996).
- Participants must have the presence of fixations in either the mortise joint, the subtalar joint or the tarsals (Brantingham et al, 2007).
- Participants that give informed consent to participate in the research.
- Participants on muscle relaxants or any anti inflammatory medication will be required to have a wash out period of three days before participating in the study (Poul et al, 1993; Seth, 1999).
Exclusion
- Participants who have experienced an acute injury or acute re-injury (prior to or during the study) will be excluded from the study because it does not comply with the six-week interval (i.e. chronic injuries) (Pellow and Brantingham, 2001).
- Participants with balance disorders of a neurological and/or otological and/or vascular cause of dizziness that may mimic instability and defective proprioception at the ankle level (Clark and Burden, 2005; Kynsberg et al, 2006).
- Participants with connective tissue disorders that create excessive generalised ligamentous laxity, participants with these conditions will not benefit from the treatment with generalised hyper laxity of ligaments.
- Participants with grade three CAI/ gross mechanical instability of the lateral ankle complex as the severity of this grade of injury usually requires surgical intervention and is unresponsive to conservative therapy (Reid, 1992; Pellow and Brantingham, 2001; Rimando, 2008).Grade III: severe swelling and haemorrhage with positive anterior drawers sign and rupture of ligamentous structures.
- Participants that are contraindicated to adjustments, which include but may not be limited to (Kirkaldy - Willis and Burton, 1992).
- Absolute contraindications, Destructive injury of the skeletal structures of the body; fractures and dislocations of all varieties; neurological damage as in Cauda equina syndrome, abdominal aortic aneurysm, referred pain of a visceral nature.
- Relative Contraindications, bone demineralization, psychosomatic conditions, anticoagulant therapy and/or conditions where hemorrhaging may be present and Spondyloarthropathies.
- Participants with secondary manifestations of any of the following conditions, which may compromise balance/ proprioception, which are contraindicated to rehabilitation, which include and may not be limited to (Frontera, 1999).
- Dizziness that is present during the treatment Peripheral vascular disease
Key Trial Info
Start Date :
August 1 2010
Trial Type :
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation :
ESTIMATED
End Date :
November 1 2010
Estimated Enrollment :
30 Patients enrolled
Trial Details
Trial ID
NCT01196949
Start Date
August 1 2010
End Date
November 1 2010
Last Update
September 27 2010
Active Locations (1)
Enter a location and click search to find clinical trials sorted by distance.
1
Durban University of Technology
Durban, South Africa