Status:

UNKNOWN

The Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Implant Impression Techniques

Lead Sponsor:

Mohamed Mahmoud Dohiem

Conditions:

Missing Teeth

Eligibility:

MALE

30-50 years

Phase:

NA

Brief Summary

Intraoral oral scanning significantly improves scanning accuracy compared to digitized conventional impression techniques. The digitized closed tray impression technique showed significantly more accu...

Detailed Description

The study was a controlled clinical trial using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging and flapless surgical technique to place implants. Cone-beam Computed Topography of the patients was taken ...

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

  • Partial edentulous patients
  • Sufficient bone volume to insert implants
  • Age ranging from 30-50.
  • Good oral hygiene.
  • Intact hard and soft tissues, including treated teeth decay and healed teeth extraction socket

Exclusion

  • • Completely edentulous patients
  • Patients with Bruxism or clinching
  • need for bone augmentation,
  • uncompensated diabetes mellitus,
  • immunocompromised status, radio- and/or chemotherapy
  • previous treatment with oral and/or intravenous aminobisphosphonates.
  • Undergoing orthodontic treatment;
  • Patients with metal crowns and any other metal materials on teeth
  • Patients with soft tissue lesions and postoperative scars on the palate

Key Trial Info

Start Date :

May 20 2021

Trial Type :

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation :

ESTIMATED

End Date :

May 22 2021

Estimated Enrollment :

8 Patients enrolled

Trial Details

Trial ID

NCT04908618

Start Date

May 20 2021

End Date

May 22 2021

Last Update

June 1 2021

Active Locations (1)

Enter a location and click search to find clinical trials sorted by distance.

Page 1 of 1 (1 locations)

1

Mohamed Mahmoud Dohiem

Cairo, Egypt

The Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Implant Impression Techniques | DecenTrialz